
Short Answer: What is the best AEO tool in 2026?
The best AEO tool depends on your budget and goal. For overall value, Searchable leads with purpose-built AI search tracking, GA4 attribution, and an AI agent starting at $50/month. For the lowest cost of entry, Otterly.ai starts at $29/month. For enterprise teams that need the deepest data and broadest engine coverage, Profound is the category benchmark with eight-engine tracking and autonomous content generation.
Quick Summary
- Searchable – Best overall. Purpose-built for AI search with GA4 traffic attribution and an AI agent that tells you exactly what to fix.
- Otterly.ai – Best budget entry point. Six-plus AI engines from $29/month, no expertise required.
- Profound – Best for enterprise and agencies. The only tool with prompt volume data, 8-engine coverage, and autonomous content generation.
- SE Visible – Best for SEO teams adding AEO. Solid tracking for US/UK teams already in the SE Ranking ecosystem.
- HubSpot AEO – Best for HubSpot customers. CRM-connected AI visibility at $50/month with a 28-day free trial.
Key Takeaways
- Searchable is the strongest all-around option for SMBs and growth teams that want AEO built for AI search, not bolted onto an SEO tool.
- Otterly.ai is the lowest-cost way to start tracking AI visibility, with plans from $29/month covering six-plus AI engines.
- Profound is the enterprise standard: the only tool with prompt volume data, autonomous content generation, and 8-engine coverage.
- SE Visible works best for US and UK-based teams already in the SE Ranking ecosystem, though weekly refresh and no optimization features are real limitations.
- HubSpot AEO is built for marketers who live in HubSpot and want CRM-connected AI visibility without a separate vendor.
| Tool | Starting Price | AI Engines Tracked | Free Trial | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Searchable | $50/month | 3 (ChatGPT, AI Overviews, Perplexity) | 14 days | SMBs, agencies, non-technical teams |
| Otterly.ai | $29/month | 6+ (ChatGPT, Perplexity, AI Overviews, Copilot + add-ons) | Yes | Startups, budget-conscious teams |
| Profound | $99/month | 8 (most comprehensive in category) | Free AEO report | Enterprise, growth-stage, agencies |
| SE Visible | $99/month | 4 (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, AI Mode) | 10 days | SEO teams, US/UK-focused brands |
| HubSpot AEO | $50/month | 3 (ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity) | 28 days | HubSpot users, CRM-connected marketers |
Answer Engine Optimization has moved from an experiment to a budget line. Brands that showed up in ChatGPT and Perplexity a year ago without trying are now watching competitors close that gap, and teams that have not started measuring AI visibility yet are already behind. The tooling has matured fast. Picking the wrong platform wastes budget and time you do not have.
This list covers the five tools we recommend in 2026, ranked by overall value, not funding or name recognition. Each tool wins in a specific situation. Read through to find yours.
How We Scored Each Tool
Summary: We weighted each tool across six criteria that reflect what actually matters when you are running AEO as a real function, not just testing the category.
Every tool on this list was evaluated against the same six criteria. Weights reflect how much each dimension affects real-world outcomes for the majority of buyers.
| Criterion | Weight | Searchable | Otterly.ai | Profound | SE Visible | HubSpot AEO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price efficiency | 25% | 4/5 | 5/5 | 2/5 | 3/5 | 4/5 |
| Engine coverage | 20% | 3/5 | 5/5 | 5/5 | 3/5 | 2/5 |
| Actionability | 20% | 5/5 | 2/5 | 5/5 | 2/5 | 4/5 |
| Traffic attribution | 15% | 5/5 | 1/5 | 4/5 | 2/5 | 3/5 |
| Ease of setup | 10% | 5/5 | 5/5 | 3/5 | 4/5 | 5/5 |
| Enterprise readiness | 10% | 3/5 | 1/5 | 5/5 | 3/5 | 4/5 |
| Weighted Score | 100% | 4.15 | 3.40 | 3.90 | 2.75 | 3.55 |
#1. Searchable: Best for Purpose-Built AEO With Traffic Attribution
Summary: Searchable was built from scratch for AI search, connects visibility data directly to GA4 traffic, and uses an in-platform AI agent to turn findings into specific fixes.
Most AEO tools started as SEO platforms that added AI tracking as a feature. Searchable went the other way: it was designed for AI search from day one, with no SEO legacy to carry. That difference shows up in how the platform thinks about what you actually need. Visibility data alone is not the goal. The goal is knowing what to do with it, and being able to show your CMO that it moved something real.
The core workflow runs in three steps: track how your brand appears across ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, and Perplexity; diagnose gaps through an AI agent that speaks plain English and outputs implementation-ready code for developers; then close the loop through GA4 and Google Search Console integrations that tie AI citations to actual site traffic. That last part is rare. Most platforms stop at the mention count. Searchable connects mentions to the traffic metric your CMO cares about.
The AI agent is the sharpest differentiator. Instead of a static report, you can ask it follow-up questions about your own data: why a specific page is not being cited, what to fix first, what the gap looks like against a specific competitor. One reviewer reported that the agent identified their NextJS framework and produced ready-to-use code for the fixes it recommended. For non-technical marketers, that is the equivalent of having an AEO analyst available inside the platform.
Integrations include GA4, Google Search Console, WordPress, HubSpot, and Salesforce, available from the entry tier, which is notable. Most competitors lock integrations behind top-tier plans or skip CRM entirely. Searchable includes them at $50/month.
Searchable Pricing
| Plan | Price | What You Get |
|---|---|---|
| Starter | $50/month | 50 prompts, 1 domain, ChatGPT only |
| Professional | $125/month | 100 prompts, unlimited domains, ChatGPT + AI Overviews + Perplexity |
| Scale | $400/month | 500 prompts, white-label reports, dedicated specialist |
| Custom | Quote | Adds Claude, Grok, and Copilot tracking |
The Starter tier is honest about its limits: one domain, 50 prompts, and ChatGPT only. Most teams building a real AEO program will need Professional at $125/month, where three-platform coverage and unlimited domains unlock. The 14-day free trial requires no demo call. Searchable holds a 4.3/5 Trustpilot rating, with 92% of reviews at five stars. Read the full Searchable review for a deeper look.
Skip it if your audience researches primarily in Claude or Copilot (those require a Custom quote), or if you want one platform that writes and publishes content for you.
#2. Otterly.ai: Best Entry-Level AEO Tracker
Summary: Otterly.ai offers the lowest barrier to entry in the category, covering six-plus AI engines starting at $29/month, with enough depth for teams that need essential monitoring without data overwhelm.
Otterly.ai occupies a specific and useful lane: it is the most accessible AEO tracker in the category, both in price and in complexity. Where enterprise tools surface layers of competitive data that require an analyst to interpret, Otterly focuses on giving you a clear pulse on your AI visibility without requiring deep AEO expertise to act on it. For early-stage teams, solo marketers, and startups that need to start somewhere without a large software budget, that is exactly the right pitch.
The platform monitors brand mentions across six-plus AI engines in a single dashboard. Base plans cover ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, and Microsoft Copilot, with Google AI Mode and Gemini available as add-ons. Core features include brand visibility index and domain ranking, link citation analysis and AI prompt research, GEO audits, sentiment tracking that alerts you if an AI model starts framing your brand negatively, and 50-plus country coverage, giving it global reach some pricier competitors still lack.
The tradeoff for the low price is depth. Otterly is designed for tracking and awareness, not for generating detailed competitive intelligence or content recommendations. It will tell you where you stand and how it changes over time. It will not hand you a prioritized action list or connect your AI visibility data to revenue metrics.
Otterly.ai Pricing
| Plan | Monthly Price | Annual Price |
|---|---|---|
| Lite | $29/month | $25/month |
| Standard | $189/month | $160/month |
| Premium | $489/month | $422/month |
A free trial is available before committing to any paid plan. Otterly is the right starting point if your goal is getting data on the board quickly and cheaply. It is not the right long-term platform if you need actionable optimization guidance or CRM-connected attribution.
#3. Profound: Best for Enterprise and Agency Teams
Summary: Profound is the category benchmark: the only AEO platform with real prompt volume data, autonomous content generation, and eight-engine coverage, backed by $58.5M in funding and a customer list that includes Ramp, MongoDB, and US Bank.
Profound is what the AEO category looks like at full maturity. It has raised $58.5 million across three rounds led by Sequoia Capital and counts Ramp, MongoDB, Indeed, Docusign, Figma, and US Bank among its customers. Ramp used Profound to achieve a documented 7x increase in AI visibility. That case study has become the benchmark every other AEO vendor measures itself against.
What separates Profound from the rest of the field starts with prompt volume data. It is the only platform that tells you not just whether you are being cited, but how often the underlying query is actually being asked across AI engines. Think of it as keyword search volume for the AI era. Without it, you are optimizing without knowing whether the prompts you are targeting have any real audience. Profound also tracks eight AI engines simultaneously: ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, Gemini, Microsoft Copilot, Claude, and Grok.
The Agents feature takes it further. Profound can autonomously draft content briefs, full articles, and landing pages grounded in real visibility data, then publish directly to WordPress, Sanity, or Contentful and notify your team via Slack. The Opportunities panel surfaces the specific journalists to pitch, Reddit threads to engage with, and content topics to create based on where competitors are winning. Third-party citations are what move AI visibility at the enterprise level, and Profound maps exactly where to go get them.
Profound Pricing
| Plan | Price | What Unlocks |
|---|---|---|
| Starter | $99/month | Visibility tracking, basic prompt monitoring |
| Growth | $399/month | Multi-platform tracking, Opportunities panel, Agents content generation |
| Enterprise | Custom | All 8 engines, SSO, SOC 2 reporting, dedicated strategist |
Profound is expensive, and it is worth being direct about that. The features that move the needle unlock at the $399/month Growth tier, and enterprise pricing typically runs $1,500 to $2,000-plus per month. For growth-stage and enterprise teams running AEO as a core function, the ROI case is clear. Read the full Profound review for the complete breakdown. Profound holds G2 Winter 2026 Leader status and is SOC 2 Type II certified.
Skip it if you are an early-stage startup or solo marketer where basic citation tracking is all you need right now.
#4. SE Visible: Best for SEO Teams Adding AEO
Summary: SE Visible is SE Ranking’s standalone AI visibility platform, solid for US and UK-based teams that want to bolt AEO tracking onto an existing SEO workflow, though weekly data refreshes and no optimization features are real limitations to know about.
SE Visible launched in 2025 as SE Ranking’s dedicated AEO product, separate from its core SEO suite. The case for it is clear if you are already a SE Ranking customer: adding AI visibility tracking without onboarding a new vendor, at a price point that sits well below enterprise alternatives, and with the ability to cross-reference AI citation data against SE Ranking’s existing SEO metrics in one workflow.
The platform tracks brand visibility across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Google AI Mode. Its competitor benchmarking is genuinely strong: the “No Cited” feature surfaces prompts where rivals are appearing and you are not, which functions as a ready-made content gap list. Sentiment analysis is included and flags whether AI mentions are framing your brand positively, neutrally, or negatively. Data is pulled from real AI responses rather than API simulations, which matters for accuracy.
The limitations are real and worth knowing before committing. US and UK only, with no European, APAC, or LATAM coverage as of 2026. Data updates once per week, not daily, so you cannot respond quickly to citation drops. SE Visible shows you where you stand but does not tell you what to change to improve it. And most teams running a real AEO program will need the $189/month tier at minimum once prompt caps become a constraint.
SE Visible Pricing
| Plan | Price | Prompts / Brands |
|---|---|---|
| Entry | $99/month | 150 prompts, 3 brands |
| Mid | $189/month | 450 prompts, 5 brands, full multi-platform coverage |
| Plus | $355/month | 1,000 prompts, 10 brands |
A 10-day free trial with no credit card required is available. For a deeper look at where SE Visible delivers and where it falls short, see the full SE Visible review.
Skip it if your audience is outside the US or UK, or if you need daily data and built-in optimization guidance.
#5. HubSpot AEO: Best for Teams Already in HubSpot
Summary: HubSpot AEO is a $50/month beta product that tracks AI visibility across ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity, with CRM-powered prompt suggestions and recommendations that connect directly to execution inside HubSpot.
HubSpot AEO is the newest entrant on this list, launched in beta in 2026 after HubSpot acquired AEO platform XFunnel. The pitch is clear: if you are already running marketing out of HubSpot, adding AI visibility tracking as a $50/month add-on, with your CRM data already connected, is a lower-friction path than evaluating a dedicated AEO vendor.
The platform covers ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity. The dashboard gives you a brand visibility score with trend data over time, competitor share of voice across the same prompts, citation analysis showing which domains and content types are driving AI mentions, and prioritized recommendations with a specific reason attached to each action.
The CRM integration is where HubSpot pulls ahead of category-neutral tools. Prompt suggestions are generated from what HubSpot already knows about your company, competitors, and industry, so you are starting from context rather than building your tracking list from scratch. With Marketing Hub Pro or Enterprise, recommendations connect directly to HubSpot’s content and social tools so you can act without switching platforms. The 28-day free trial includes 25 prompts across all three engines with no credit card required.
HubSpot AEO Pricing
| Plan | Price | What You Get |
|---|---|---|
| HubSpot AEO | $50/month ($45 annual) | 25 prompts, ChatGPT + Gemini + Perplexity, brand visibility score, citation analysis, recommendations |
| AEO in Marketing Hub Pro/Enterprise | Included with plan | Expanded prompts, CRM-powered recommendations, in-platform content execution |
The limitation to know: this is still a beta product, which means the feature set is thinner than dedicated AEO platforms and will keep evolving. Claude and Copilot are not tracked. Prompt volume at $50/month is capped at 25, which is enough to evaluate but not enough to run a full program. If your AEO needs are serious and you are not already embedded in HubSpot, one of the dedicated platforms on this list will serve you better.
Skip it if you are not already a HubSpot customer, or if you need more than three AI engines tracked and a larger prompt set without paying for a full HubSpot Marketing Hub subscription.
Monitoring vs. Execution: What Each Tool Actually Does
Summary: There is a significant gap between tools that show you what is happening and tools that help you change it. This matrix shows where each platform falls.
Most buyers conflate monitoring and execution when evaluating AEO tools. Monitoring tells you where your brand stands. Execution helps you improve it. Only two tools on this list do both fully.
| Capability | Searchable | Otterly.ai | Profound | SE Visible | HubSpot AEO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monitor visibility in AI engines | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diagnose why gaps exist | ✓ | ~ | ✓ | ~ | ✓ |
| Recommend specific fixes | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ |
| Draft content to close gaps | ~ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ~ |
| Publish content directly | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓* |
| Attribute citations to traffic/revenue | ✓ | ✗ | ~ | ✗ | ~ |
| Alert on visibility changes | ~ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ~ |
✓ = Full support. ~ = Partial support. ✗ = Not available. * = Within HubSpot only.
Effective Cost: What You Actually Pay Per Prompt
Summary: Headline pricing is misleading because prompt limits vary widely. Normalizing by cost per 100 prompts reveals the real cost structure across tiers.
Comparing $29/month against $399/month tells you nothing without knowing how many prompts each plan includes and how many AI engines you can run them across. The table below normalizes by cost per 100 prompts so you can compare actual value across the tiers you are likely to consider.
| Tool + Plan | Monthly Price | Prompt Limit | Engines | Cost per 100 Prompts | Cost per Engine |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Otterly.ai Lite | $29 | ~50 | 6+ | $58 | $4.83 |
| Searchable Starter | $50 | 50 | 1 | $100 | $50.00 |
| HubSpot AEO | $50 | 25 | 3 | $200 | $16.67 |
| Searchable Professional | $125 | 100 | 3 | $125 | $41.67 |
| SE Visible Entry | $99 | 150 | 4 | $66 | $24.75 |
| Profound Starter | $99 | 50 | 3 | $198 | $33.00 |
| SE Visible Mid | $189 | 450 | 4 | $42 | $47.25 |
| Profound Growth | $399 | 500 | 8 | $80 | $49.88 |
Prompt limits noted as approximate (~) where vendors do not publish exact figures for all tiers.
Engine Coverage Is Not Equal
Summary: More engines tracked is not always better. What matters is whether you are tracking the AI engines your specific buyers actually use.
Every vendor leads with their engine count. Eight engines sounds better than three. But if your buyers are B2B procurement teams working inside Microsoft 365, Copilot matters far more than Grok. If your buyers are consumers researching on mobile, Google AI Overviews is where the volume is. Here is what you need to know about each engine before deciding which ones to track.
| AI Engine | Primary Audience | Best For Tracking If… | Available In |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChatGPT | 180M+ weekly users, broad consumer and B2B | Almost every brand. Start here. | All 5 tools |
| Google AI Overviews | Google search users, ~15% of queries | Your buyers search for product categories on Google | Searchable, Profound, SE Visible |
| Perplexity | Tech-literate, research-focused, early adopters | SaaS, developer tools, research-heavy categories | Searchable, Otterly.ai, Profound, HubSpot AEO |
| Gemini | Google Workspace users, Android users | Enterprise B2B with Google Workspace accounts | Profound, SE Visible, HubSpot AEO, Otterly.ai (add-on) |
| Microsoft Copilot | Microsoft 365 enterprise users | B2B with Microsoft-heavy buyer organizations | Profound (Enterprise), Otterly.ai, Searchable (Custom) |
| Claude | Developer, professional, and enterprise users | Dev tools, AI-adjacent products, professional services | Profound, Searchable (Custom) |
| Grok | X/Twitter power users, news-forward | Consumer brands with strong social presence | Profound, Searchable (Custom) |
| Google AI Mode | Google Search early adopters | Brands with strong informational content strategies | Profound, SE Visible, Otterly.ai (add-on) |
7 Questions to Ask Before Building Your Prompt Portfolio
Summary: The prompts you track define what you learn. Bad prompts return useless data no matter which tool you use.
Every AEO tool tracks your brand across a set of prompts you define. The quality of your prompt portfolio determines the quality of your data. Ask these seven questions before finalizing the prompts you load into any platform.
- Does this prompt reflect how real buyers actually phrase questions in AI search, not how your team describes your product internally?
- Is it specific enough to return a brand-level answer rather than a generic category response?
- Does it map to a real buying stage: awareness, evaluation, or decision?
- Have you tested it across at least three AI engines to confirm it generates comparative brand responses?
- Is it concise enough that the AI will not lose the brand-comparison context before generating its answer?
- Does it naturally invite competitor comparisons rather than defaulting to a generic informational answer?
- Would the person who needs to act on the data recognize this as a question a real prospect would ask?
A good starting benchmark: 20 to 30 prompts across three buying stages. Ten prompts per stage is manageable. Anything under 15 total gives you too thin a sample to spot patterns. For a deeper look at building a prompt portfolio that actually moves the needle, see How to Measure AEO Success.
30/60/90-Day AEO Rollout by Team Size
Summary: What you should be doing in months one, two, and three depends on your team size, budget, and starting point.
| Timeline | SMB (1-2 person team) | Growth (5-20 person team) | Enterprise (dedicated function) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Days 1-30 | Start Otterly.ai or Searchable trial. Define 20-30 prompts mirroring real customer questions. Establish visibility baseline across 2-3 engines. | Audit existing content library against AI response types. Map prompts to buyer journey stages. Launch Searchable or Profound trial with full team access. | Evaluate Profound with dedicated strategist call. Define brand prompt portfolio (100+ prompts). Assign internal AEO ownership and reporting cadence. |
| Days 31-60 | Audit top 3 cited competitors. Identify 3-5 content gaps. Publish first AEO-targeted content addressing missing topics. | Run Opportunities panel (Profound) or AI agent analysis (Searchable). Prioritize 5 content fixes. Start journalist and media outreach for third-party citations. | Integrate platform with GA4, Salesforce, and CMS. Run full competitive benchmark across all 8 engines. Deploy content agents for first round of briefs. |
| Days 61-90 | Review baseline vs. current. Expand prompt library to 50. Begin third-party citation outreach via relevant publications and communities. | Build internal AEO reporting dashboard. Set monthly visibility targets. Present first results to leadership with attribution data. | Present AEO ROI to C-suite with GA4 attribution data. Expand to all tracked engines. Set quarterly citation targets by engine and buyer stage. |
Before You Buy: Vendor Risk Checklist
Summary: AEO is a young category. Before committing budget, evaluate each vendor on the risks that matter most for a tool you will depend on for strategic decisions.
| Risk Factor | Searchable | Otterly.ai | Profound | SE Visible | HubSpot AEO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Company stability | Medium | Medium | Low | Low | Very Low |
| Platform lock-in | Low | Low | Medium | Medium | High |
| Data freshness | Daily | Daily | Daily | Weekly | Real-time |
| Prompt cap constraints | Medium | Low | Medium | Medium | High (25 cap) |
| Real vs. API responses | Real | Real | Real | Real | Real |
How to Choose the Right AEO Tool
Summary: The right tool depends on your budget, whether you need optimization guidance alongside tracking, and which AI engines your buyers actually use.
Start with your primary use case. If you need to start fast on a small budget, Otterly.ai at $29/month is the lowest-friction entry point. If you want AEO tracking connected to real traffic data and specific fixes, Searchable at $125/month is the best overall value for most teams. If you are running a serious program at a growth-stage or enterprise company, Profound is the benchmark and nothing else comes close on data depth. If you are already in SE Ranking and just want to add AI tracking, SE Visible is the natural next step with no new vendor required. If HubSpot is your marketing stack, HubSpot AEO at $50/month plugs AI visibility directly into that workflow.
One thing every team should know before evaluating any of these tools: AEO tracking data is directional, not deterministic. AI responses vary, and a tool telling you that your brand appears in 40% of tracked prompts is a trend indicator, not a fixed measurement. Use the data to identify where to focus and to track whether your content and citation work is moving the needle over time. For a deeper look at what AEO metrics actually mean and how to report on them internally, see How to Measure AEO Success.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the best AEO tool in 2026?
The best overall AEO tool in 2026 is Searchable for most teams: purpose-built for AI search, connected to GA4 traffic data, and with an AI agent that converts findings into specific fixes starting at $50/month. For enterprise teams, Profound is the category benchmark. For budget-conscious teams, Otterly.ai starts at $29/month.
What does an AEO tool actually do?
An AEO tool tracks how often your brand appears in AI-generated answers on platforms like ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity, then benchmarks your visibility against competitors and surfaces gaps where competitors are cited and you are not. More advanced tools layer in optimization guidance, content recommendations, and traffic attribution on top of the tracking.
How much does AEO software cost?
AEO tool pricing in 2026 ranges from $29/month (Otterly.ai Lite) to $399/month and above (Profound Growth). Most teams running a real AEO program spend between $50 and $200/month. Enterprise platforms like Profound can run $1,500 to $2,000-plus per month. HubSpot AEO and Searchable both start at $50/month with meaningful free trials.
Do I need an AEO tool if I already use an SEO tool?
Yes, in most cases. Traditional SEO tools measure rankings in Google’s blue-link results. AEO tools measure how your brand appears in synthesized AI answers from ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews. These are different channels with different measurement needs. Some SEO platforms like SE Ranking now offer an AI visibility add-on (SE Visible), but dedicated AEO tools generally go deeper on tracking and optimization.
Which AEO tool is best for small businesses?
For small businesses, Otterly.ai at $29/month is the lowest-cost entry point across six-plus AI engines. Searchable at $50/month adds an AI agent for specific recommendations and GA4 integration, making it easier to show ROI. HubSpot AEO at $50/month is a strong option for businesses already on HubSpot, with a 28-day free trial and no credit card required.
What is the difference between AEO and GEO?
AEO (Answer Engine Optimization) and GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) are often used interchangeably, but GEO refers specifically to optimizing for generative AI outputs like ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews. In practice, the tools on this list are built for generative AI visibility and the terms are largely interchangeable in the market. When evaluating tools, focus on which specific AI engines they track rather than which term they use.
Which AEO tool is the cheapest?
Otterly.ai is the cheapest AEO tool at $29/month for the Lite plan ($25/month annually), covering six-plus AI engines. Searchable and HubSpot AEO both start at $50/month, with 14-day and 28-day free trials respectively. Profound starts at $99/month but includes a free AI visibility report with no credit card required.
Which AEO tool tracks the most AI engines?
Profound tracks the most AI engines, covering eight platforms: ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, Gemini, Microsoft Copilot, Claude, and Grok. Otterly.ai covers six-plus on base plans. SE Visible covers four. Searchable covers three on standard plans, with Claude, Grok, and Copilot available on Custom plans. HubSpot AEO covers ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity.
Written by
Kai Williams
Kai Williams covers AI search, AEO, and the tools marketers use to track and improve brand visibility in AI-generated answers. He has tested and reviewed every major AEO platform currently available and writes regularly about the intersection of marketing strategy and generative AI at Prompt Insider.